<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sites vs. MS SharePoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/</link>
	<description>Adventures on the web, emerging technologies, random thoughts and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:26:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharepoint Sceptic</title>
		<link>http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-46105</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharepoint Sceptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/#comment-46105</guid>
		<description>The problem with Google is that it doesn&#039;t integrate with MS products that companies are so used to - MS Office, MS Outlook. An alternative for companies which cant afford SharePoint, is to go for an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperoffice.com/sharepoint-alternative/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online SharePoint alternative like HyperOffice&lt;/a&gt;, which works well with MS tools, brings most of the collaboration features, and cuts down costs through a subscription based model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Google is that it doesn&#8217;t integrate with MS products that companies are so used to &#8211; MS Office, MS Outlook. An alternative for companies which cant afford SharePoint, is to go for an <a href="http://www.hyperoffice.com/sharepoint-alternative/" rel="nofollow">online SharePoint alternative like HyperOffice</a>, which works well with MS tools, brings most of the collaboration features, and cuts down costs through a subscription based model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-31303</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/#comment-31303</guid>
		<description>Limited? How is Google sites limited compared to Sharepoint? And who cares about themes/page layouts from a brand new product? More meat, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limited? How is Google sites limited compared to Sharepoint? And who cares about themes/page layouts from a brand new product? More meat, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pranav</title>
		<link>http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-31263</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thinkworx.com/2008/03/01/google-sites-vs-ms-sharepoint/#comment-31263</guid>
		<description>Good article... i was not knowing about the Google sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article&#8230; i was not knowing about the Google sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
